Anonymous Marine comments on Joshua Boston’s letter
CNN’s iReports, the same people who made Joshua Boston’s open letter to Diane Feinsten famous, print a response to Boston’s letter from some anonymous person who claims that he/she is also a Marine. Not a four-tour combat Marine like Boston, but a journalist, a Marine nonetheless;
When I read about the open letter…I couldn’t help but feel temporarily ashamed of also sharing the title of former Marine. Boston defiantly refuses to register his guns even if laws are passed requiring him to do so. In this refusal, he comes off as tone-deaf and unsympathetic to the victims of mass shootings in Newtown, Aurora, and so many other places. His ranting letter is paranoid exhibition of one concerned not with preventing the deaths of more innocents, but of maintaining his rights to own devices of war. I want to set the record straight, not all Marines are so insensitive to the recent tragedies, or ignorant about the need for arms restrictions.
While I did not experience combat, I served in Afghanistan as a Marine, exiting the service as a Sergeant in 2008 to enter college. My experiences in the Marine Corps of course led me to train with semi and fully automatic weapons, and yet, I have no desire to own these weapons now that I am out of the service. I can’t see why any civilian needs semi-automatic, high-capacity weapons designed to kill as many people as quickly as possible, and I support a ban of future sales in addition to a retroactive ban that would force Joshua Boston to relinquish his weapons.
Boston’s attitude towards authority is frankly disgusting and his open letter is wrong in both its assumptions about why the gun-control debate has become heated, and the reasons why we should care about his opinions at all. It implies that because he served in Iraq and Afghanistan as a Marine, that he can choose which laws to obey while at home. This is of course, incorrect, and gives other veterans a bad name. Regardless of his personal beliefs about gun-control, Boston should obey the law, or stop using the title of Marine veteran so proudly.
The article headline calls Boston “gun worshipping Marine veteran”. I haven’t seen anyone “worship” guns, per se. But, ya know at least Boston attached his name to his letter, he didn’t cower behind some indecipherable screen name. When someone asked me if Boston had really been a Marine, I was able to verify it. Not so with this dude/chick.
What gets me is the people who say “I don’t own guns and I don’t think anyone else should either” or “no one needs high capacity magazines”. They’re the same sort of people who cheer for the tax hike on richer Americans. Personally, I don’t see the use for video games, or Airsoft gear, or NASCAR, or any of a thousand things that I think are stupid. But, I’m not trying to take those things away from people.
Some other anonymous dingus took exception to my comment about people not needing Porsches or Ferraris saying those cars aren’t used to kill large numbers of people. Neither are my guns, which I bought legally and are locked up in my gun safe until I want to use them. You probably also don’t understand why I enjoy cigars – that’s your problem.
January 10th, 2013 at 9:50 am
Anonymous “Marine” here must have forgotten the oath of enlistment that he probably never took anyway.
January 10th, 2013 at 9:57 am
I know if I were going to worship guns, I would probably offer human sacrifices to them, preferably people that think that legislation that doesn’t exist yet should be preemptively obeyed. Too bad such sacrifice wouldn’t be covered under the free exercise clause.
Didn’t some fly-by, troll-tool, bring up Nuremberg on another thread? Here it is: a fellow like Boston would be the kind of Marine that would follow up his obligation to disobey an unlawful order. This particular Marine-cum-PoisePantyLiner is entirely too eager to obey laws that don’t exist yet. Between the two, which would break down more positively under Milgram’s obedience tests?
I was, until recently, convinced that we have to “do something”, but “something” seems to be purposeless. “Doing nothing” seems preferable to afflicting reasonable people with concepts that yield no result.
January 10th, 2013 at 9:57 am
Dingus said: “I support a ban of future sales in addition to a retroactive ban that would force Joshua Boston to relinquish his weapons.”
Clearly this idiot does not know his 4th and 5th Amendments to the Constitution.
I also find it ironic how libtards support civil disobedience for their causes, but it’s not allowed for our causes.
January 10th, 2013 at 9:58 am
They were able to hit pretty much every single liberal talking point in three paragraphs.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:00 am
Dear “anonymous” Dumbass:
We don’t “worship” guns so much as we worship and cherish our RIGHTS, which include the RIGHT to have weapons, even ones you might not like.
Remember that if certain rights are at risk, ALL rights are at risk, whether you like them or not. Sleep well, knowing your betters are carrying the weight you can’t/won’t.
Oh, and I’d love to see an FOIA on this character, but then again they probably knew that when they didn’t have the fucking stones to sign their names to their work.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:01 am
Do the Marines have a “camp follower” MOS?
January 10th, 2013 at 10:01 am
“I can’t see why any civilian needs semi-automatic, high-capacity weapons designed to kill as many people as quickly as possible”
This seems a little suspicious, almost sounds as if he is confusing auto with semi-auto.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:03 am
I noticed some of the same liberal boilerplate strawmen arguments in this response that I have seen in almost every statement from those who support gun grabbing, i.e., “… I can’t see why any civilian needs semi-automatic, high-capacity weapons designed to kill as many people as quickly as possible, and I support a ban of future sales in addition to a retroactive ban that would force Joshua Boston to relinquish his weapons.”
Notice the “designed to kill as many people as quickly as possible” bit. You will see it in almost all the screeds against gun ownership. My other point is if he doesn’t want to own such weapons, fine, don’t buy them, but don’t force the rest of us to conform to your views.
I don’t own any of those type weapons, yet, but with this latest temper tantrum from the left I am tempted to buy one just to piss them off further. Yes I own guns, but I have my own preference.
I also remember something I heard from my Infantry days, since the beginning of time 99% of all weapons used or designed were designed with one purpose in mind, to kill or maim the average Infantryman. Whether it was rock like Cain used against Abel or it’s nuclear bombs, man can turn anything within reach into a weapon with which to kill his fellow man.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:03 am
That’s the problem here Jonn, they think they can dictate what you “need”. They mean to do it in terms of health care, the size and sugar content of the beverages you choose to drink, and what you like to do in your leisure time.
They also have no intention of conforming to those rules they create for you. They will still be armed for their own protection. They will still get their own special health care, and they will drink whatever they damn well please….
Sounds a lot like the commies to me…
January 10th, 2013 at 10:08 am
I would venture a guess that “Anonymous” was a desk jockey that only joined for the college money. And I would put my next paycheck on it that they had no clue to the meaning of the oath they took, nor why it is to the Constitution of the United States. I will go futher in saying that none of their college courses were Constitutional law or in depth American history.
Only un-educated individuals still believe the Second Amendment was written to protect our Hunting clubs!
January 10th, 2013 at 10:10 am
Along with #3/Rock8 mentioned from the article: “…and I support a ban of future sales in addition to a retroactive ban that would force Joshua Boston to relinquish his weapons.”
Clearly, this “anonymous” Marine needs to read his/her Constitution, which also prohibits the passing of ex post facto laws. In other words, you can’t make what was previously legal, suddenly illegal.
In light of that, I suspect if the person really was a former service member, either he/she didn’t understand the importance of taking the oath upon enlistment, didn’t care, or had his/her fingers crossed when it was taken.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:12 am
Call me crazy, but I believe the letter is BS.
The construction is circumspect, it jumps around and really does not focus on one point.
Furthermore, I have yet to meet a real Marine that will not put his name on something.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:12 am
And again, I question the veracity of this “Marine’s” claims, because even though I’m just a dumbass squid, my experience with M-16′s versus my own “hunting weapons” or older rifles lends credence to what one poster (I forget who, sorry) who suggested I get another higher-powered weapon instead of an AR-15 “poodle killer”.
Try hitting a target 600-plus yards off with an AR-15 and dropping it with one shot. Now do the same with a .30-06, .300 WinMag, .338 Lapua, etc. YMMV.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:33 am
Fortunately Mr. Anonymous Marine’s paranoid ranting does not represent the views of Marines nor the Marine Corps in it’s entirety. If anything it represents the views of a certain group of people that just don’t seem to get it, and probably never will. That being said, anonymous “Marine”, get bent you fucking douche rocket.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:34 am
@3 and 11: I will then force everyone who votes to have a legitimate, state issued ID, that proves you are a citizen of this country and are legal to vote. What? That’s a Constitutional right? So what? If it’s good for us, it’s good for you.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:35 am
Only makes sense that this “marine” is anonymous right, not like they would make up a person to refute the original letter to push their agenda….would they?
January 10th, 2013 at 10:38 am
OT–racist. Don’t you know you can’t challenge the liberal agenda?
January 10th, 2013 at 10:38 am
This is a good example of the Liberal/Progressive vs Conservative mindset. If a Conservative doesn’t like something or some particular action, he doesn’t engage in it. He doesn’t try to get it banned for everyone.
The Liberal/Progressive is much more Fascist in his actions. He basically wants to inflict his value system upon everyone by any means necessary.
For myself, I’ll not submit, I’ll resist, I’ll not retreat. I aim to misbehave.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:39 am
if that guy made sgt in the corps, they might want to re-examine their promotion criteria. there’s a lot of guys on this site who i would stand with, army and marine, who have been under fire. by his own admission, he hasn’t been. even though i was only a convoy escort MP, and not a grunt, where the water really hits the wheel, i wouldn’t want to have to rely on this guy. and like sparky, i like a heavier round. the M14 was the best rifle i ever used.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:48 am
That doesn’t sound like any Marine I’ve ever known. Maybe there are some somewhere, but that writer’s skin didn’t sound thick enough to me. Anybody ever heard a Marine use any of the following words: “insensitive,” “ashamed,” “unsympathetic,” “ignorant,” or “exhibition.”
January 10th, 2013 at 10:49 am
MAJike: think you might need to double-check your screen-name here, amigo. Looks like something “hiccuped” there.
January 10th, 2013 at 10:51 am
Reaperman: I believe I’ve heard a Marine or two use the word “ignorant”. But if I recall correctly, it was generally followed by a hyphenated word or two that I won’t repeat here. (smile)
January 10th, 2013 at 11:11 am
Anyone else have trouble concealed carrying their M240Bs?
January 10th, 2013 at 11:14 am
No way is the writer a Marine. Every Marine I know actualy has a pair.
January 10th, 2013 at 11:14 am
Every time I hear the exotic-car comparison I think of douchebag Wendell Turley (think that name is spelled right) who was one of the original sue-the-gun-manufacturer liability lawyers. Believe it was 60 Minutes that did a segment on him, in which he roundly condemned “these things that were built with the sole purpose of breaking the law” – as he was climbing into his Ferrari.
Confiscation: I would think “OK, they can have ‘em… as long as I get to make up a list of what I consider harmful and you confiscate them, too”. Let me see… what could I ban….
January 10th, 2013 at 11:15 am
@23, I know my M2 leaves a buldge in my jacket.
January 10th, 2013 at 11:23 am
Marine takes torch as Spokesman for Sanity…
Cpl Joshua Boston, former Marine, stepped into the spotlight following his open letter challenging Senator Feinstein’s gun grab legislation, and calling Britain’s Piers Morgan to return to the island of Banned Guns. Boston is representing sanity fair…
January 10th, 2013 at 11:25 am
This is the kind of Marine that, when given the Executive Order, with go down American streets kicking in American doors.
January 10th, 2013 at 11:28 am
The letter writer, if in the Marine Corps… was definitely a Blue Falcon…
January 10th, 2013 at 11:39 am
If I didn’t know better, I’d swear that this “Marine’s” letter was written by the Brady Campaign. The phraseology and construction matches what and how they’ve been saying the shit they say for years.
January 10th, 2013 at 11:48 am
James: hey – what you got against this classic super-hero? (smile)
Semi-seriously: anyone think TAH needs an “Order of the Blue Falcon” award for those who “blue falcon” their brothers/sisters-in-arms? Or a formal “Ballduster McSoulpatch Memorial Stolen Valor Award”? I certainly don’t have the graphic arts skills to come up with a design for either, but someone out there might. And I’m sure we could come up with a few good ideas for whoever might design either or both.
January 10th, 2013 at 12:01 pm
Another attempt at moral equivalence that fails under the first light. The title is Marine, not former Marine or ex-Marine. Marines would say, I did a combat deployment in Afghanistan, but did not see actual combat. Marines will say the unit to which attached, it is bona fides. Lastly, Marine veteran? That is also not a title, Marine is the only title earned. ‘Marine veteran is a bumper sticker’. And amazingly, the king of all missed terms, not one Semper Fidelis. Especially when trying to convince Cpl Boston (no reference to rank, either) that he would be a criminal. No remember the words Semper Fidelis is “Always Faithful”. Just a form letter with insert branch of service here. I really like the term tone-deaf, hmmm who else is tone deaf? Everybody who believes in the second amendment and the NRA earned that particular moniker. Nice FAIL anonymous.
January 10th, 2013 at 12:04 pm
I don’t know if it still is but when I was there the Ft. Campbell High School was the Falcons. Their primary color was blue. I don’t know if it was accidental or someone back in the day had a sense of humor.
January 10th, 2013 at 12:11 pm
As I pointed out in my article yesterday, twice as many people are killed with “personal objects” such as hands and feet(728 in 2011), as ALL types of rifles(323 in 2011). Will they attempt to force us to turn those in as well?
January 10th, 2013 at 12:17 pm
Dear Anonymous Marine,
I’m betting you were an ASVAB waiver also. Go away and leave the grownups alone.
January 10th, 2013 at 12:20 pm
I’m not buying it. No way that was penned by a Marine. Maybe figured “Hey, I went swimming once, and that’s just like being a Marine isn’t it?” and decided to claim the title.
January 10th, 2013 at 12:45 pm
So if there is a rift between law and the constitution and people start making their on interpretations of rules, granted it’s not ideal, but isn’t that one of the legitimate paths to fighting unjust laws. Somebody gets caught not registering their weapons, then it starts slogging up through the courts, right? Granted it’s a gamble I’m not one to take.
January 10th, 2013 at 12:46 pm
If the ‘letter writer’ is a Marine, I was door gunner for the last shuttle mission! FIRST and foremost, I still hold the title “United States Marine”. During my time in I was taught “obedience to orders”…NOT “BLIND obedience to orders”! We have a process here that says our elected representatives are supposed to sit down and finger out what’s best (okay, so it don’t happen that way but it’s SUPPOSED to) for us as a country. If Joe Bite-me, comrades omammy and feinstooge think they’re just gonna TELL me what I must do, they took better drugs than I ever did and they better be ready for a fight if they think they’re gonna just take them from me.
January 10th, 2013 at 1:25 pm
[...] Had to add this choice comment from TAH [...]
January 10th, 2013 at 1:27 pm
Hell, I was a squid and knew a bunch of Marines when I was in. If this guy served in the Corps, then I’ll eat my damn dog dish cover.
More lefty false flag bullshit.
January 10th, 2013 at 2:22 pm
If you can’t claim your own name and sign as Anonymous, then don’t try to hide behind the title Title “Marine”. I’m betting its either completely falsified or if it was a Marine its from some disillusioned terd who spent minimum contact with combat arms MOSs or weapons in General. Perhaps its one of Breanna Manning’s Gay Pen Pals.
January 10th, 2013 at 2:30 pm
#41 that did sound like one of the biggest POGs ever writing it, if it was actually a Marine at all.
January 10th, 2013 at 3:14 pm
If that was a Marine I’m a striped-ass wombat.
Semper Fi
January 10th, 2013 at 3:41 pm
I served active duty, Marine Air Wing, ’78 – ’84. No such thing as “former Marine”. Once A Marine, Always A Marine!
January 10th, 2013 at 4:16 pm
It looks like CNN thought this was a good enough story to do a follow-up. The anon Marine is now named as Nicolas DiOrio. I am, of course a firm follower of the “trust but verify” rule.
January 10th, 2013 at 4:39 pm
Sadly all groups have a 10% and no doubt this Marine is part of that group which John Murtha also belonged too. No doubt this is from a POG as bitch though. This one time at MCT I got to press the trigger on a machine gun therefor there is no need for the 2nd amendment!
January 10th, 2013 at 4:40 pm
The picture on CNN’s followup says a lot.
January 10th, 2013 at 5:10 pm
Found a Nick Diorio in a 2008 “Story Corps” bit ( by the way this Corps has nothing to do with the Marines) Seems he was a Marine Journalist Corporal from Colorado. Not impressive.
January 10th, 2013 at 5:32 pm
I am getting quite depressed about the divide in this country. On the one hand, we have people who know, understand, and believe in the Constitution, and on the other, we have people who want to live in a benevolent dictatorship or monarchy where their every need is taken care of – for “free”.
I don’t see any resolution to such a divide, except either a conservative coup, or just splitting the country in half.
January 10th, 2013 at 5:48 pm
Well, DiOrio is worried about Marines appearing “insensitive and Uncaring”. Oh Noes, that’s really something to worry about.
And, he’s all OK with ex post facto laws? Sounds like he oughta get together with TAH’s own rock-climbing ignorant hero, Joey boy.
January 10th, 2013 at 5:52 pm
UpNorth: Nyet, nyet! Use proper form of address! Proper title is
“Comrade Joseph, Glorious Hero of Rock Climbing for Greater Glory Socialist Republic of Durango”!
January 10th, 2013 at 6:13 pm
Hondo–and the fucking sad part is, Durango would be truly awesome if it weren’t for all the hippie fucksticks.
Lots of HS memories of making the run to Purgatory (whoops, the “Colorado Resort”, gotta be PC) or piling into the truck to make a run for the CO border for 3.2 beer (ugh!) or just screwing around and bombing up Wolf Creek or to Silverton.
January 10th, 2013 at 6:18 pm
I’m not going to bash this DiOrio guy, and I would love to see him debate the issue with Josh Boston. One side will have facts and reality to back it up, while the other has a former Marine from Colorado who expresses some shame in the title.
January 10th, 2013 at 6:39 pm
Thank you anonymous “marine” for revealing to us your thoughts on the matter. We know it comes from the heart based on the anonymous nature of your letter… Wait….
January 10th, 2013 at 6:40 pm
Well now, everyone just hold on a minute. This Marine has a 1st Amendment right to say what he chooses. Same as Joshua Boston has a 1st Amendment right to say what he chooses, even if what he says is in favor of a right that DiOrio wants to get rid of, or at least regulate more than it already is. I mean, we can’t be so childish that we can’t agree that some of these other Amendments need to have some more restrictions put on them; right? I mean, DiOrio wouldn’t mind if we put more restrictions on some of them; would he? Joe says that the Constitution is outdated, anyway, and that we should get rid of it, or at least the parts he doesn’t agree with. Of course, if Joe had any intellect at all, he would know that the laws in this country are based off that stupid old piece of animal skin, but that’s just details. He can get it all figured out when he becomes dictator.
January 10th, 2013 at 8:00 pm
Old Trooper, he does have both a Right to Free Speech, as well as a Right to be Silent, just as we have a Right to Free Speech, and a Right to Bear Arms.
In his case, he may have been better served using his 5th Amendment Rights, rather than his 2nd, or as Ron White said: “I had the Right to remain silent, but not the ability.”
But so long as the 2nd Amendment is not removed by an Amendment to the US Constitution, he can say all wants about his thoughts on it, as can Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Cuomo, and FineStain, but Constitutionally, any laws passed along the lines he has stated are nothing more than their Right to tell the world they are JA’s. An Exective Order, or a Joint Resolution of Congress would have the same effect, Constitutionally, Free Speech, but no weight of law.
Alexander Hamilton wanted a benevolent monarch as well.
January 10th, 2013 at 9:17 pm
Got it, Hondo. From now on it shall be “Comrade Joseph, Glorious Hero of Rock Climbing for Greater Glory Socialist Republic of Durango”! Or, how about we just settle for Joey Fuckstick? That comes close, doesn’t it?
January 10th, 2013 at 10:25 pm
Read DiOrio’s update.
He says something like “This would make people angry because it would infringe on their rights, BUT…”
That but is how you get a soldier to load somebody into a cattle car.
January 10th, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Ah yes, cigars.
January 11th, 2013 at 7:36 am
Dude/chick = dick
January 11th, 2013 at 3:14 pm
Im not a marine or a citizen Im a freeperson. My rights were god given and protected by people like Boston. Until there is an amendment to the
January 11th, 2013 at 3:30 pm
The anonymous marine … is Piers Morgan?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:34 pm
I am not a marine nor am I a CITIZEN as the word is described by blacks law dict. I am a freeperson, who will reserve his rights granted by the US CONSTITUTION. My rights were god given and protected by people like Boston. So until there is an amendment to that constitution that changes the fact of “NO INFRINGEMENT” on the right to bear ARMS(any weapon)I will conduct myself just as Boston is. He is an intelligent man who understands his rights and is exercising them so that he can keep them. Political VIEWS expressed by people are not LAW and any law created that is contrary to the constitution is NOT LAW. But merely a statue. If you dont like our RIGHTS in this country maybe you should find a different country that better suits your beliefs. Or work to have the constitution changed to suit your desires. Anything else is just an opinion which you are entitled to, due to that constitution you have so little regard for and that provides you with your liberty that keeps you safe at night. And if you decide to think that im some gun toting crazy person who wants to carry around machine guns to murder people im not. I possess not a single gun. Im all about my rights and keeping them. If you encroach on one right and allow it to happen what stops those in power from encroachment on all the other rights? Stand up now for your rights or someday very soon you’ll find you don’t have any left. Government is not your buddy or your friend, they will not protect you when they are trying to disarm you. Governemnt infringes on our rights every day, it is your duty to make sure they are pushed back into the box that was created for them and kept there. Our founding fathers knew what government would try to do in the future and they restricted them with the rights they gave us as freepeople. Only you can exercise and keep those rights before they are striped away and your a slave.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:49 pm
This whole thing reminds me of Full Metal Jacket, the dialogue between Animal Mother and Joker.
“I’m a combat correspondent”
“Well, have you seen much combat?”
And I get a kick out of service members who think that only they rate to own semi-autos because they trained on them. Most of whom trained on them in boot camp and a once yearly range qual, and that could be a disaster occasionally.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:56 pm
UpNorth: well, I guess. But that title’s not exactly one we can use in polite company, is it?
Maybe instead of “Joey F*ckstick” or “Joey Walnuts” we should just call him “Joey Peanuts”. Why? Left as an exercise for reader, amigo – left as an exercise for the reader. (smile)
January 11th, 2013 at 3:59 pm
We the people have the right to bear ARMS. Anything that restricts that in any way is NOT binding nor is it law. Because any state or legislature that creates statues or codes that conflict with that US constitution carries no weight behind it. You must exercise your right to be entitled to it. These are facts, anything else is just opinion or discussion.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:30 pm
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasdiorio
Heres your guy….
January 12th, 2013 at 1:21 am
I hope a thousand Joshua Bostons live in my neighborhood.
***
One can only conclude that anonymous is fiction from some Liberal’s mind and has no validity.
His words are an insult and meaningless.
I suppose the White House had to counter someway or another.
January 13th, 2013 at 2:19 am
“While I did not experience combat, I served in Afghanistan as a Marine, exiting the service as a Sergeant in 2008 to enter college.”
So since you really know nothing about combat and most likely worked in a ncr your opinion holds a lot less weight.
Regardless if you were so passionate to respond to this letter you wouldn’t have been a coward and hid your name.
Obedience I’d expect from a marine cowardice however….
January 14th, 2013 at 10:37 am
I admire Boston for taking a stand. To ridicule him for the job the Marine Corp put him in is garbage. I am a veteran of 17 years having served in Desert Storm, Afghanistan and Iraq. I was wounded beyond repair in Iraq in 2009 in Mosul. Medically retired in 2012 80%, I took the same oath as everyone else. Those of you attacking Boston for standing up for his rights are fools. The oath clearly states that we are to protect the Contitution (As it is, it doesn’t say oh, by the way we can change it whenever we want to) “against all enemies foreign AND domestic” (referring to those attacking the constitution). You all need to realize that the Constitution was written with the intent that it be preserved in its original state. If we allow it to be changed than we should change the name of this country because it’s no longer America as described by the framers of the United States Constitution!
January 14th, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Cpl Boston is a man. No fear after 8 yrs of combat with evil men. The one who wrote this comment can’t man up and put his name on it.
Many for lack of what may not be taught in public schools today (on purpose to control the people) don’t seem to realize they are Mr. and Mrs. America and they put the government in place to protect and work for them. Well it has been hijacked communist progressive and should be taken back, rightfully so. Ashame a lot of people are selling out to slavery.
January 15th, 2013 at 10:53 pm
Sandy hook never happened it was actors and FEMA look it up for your self no kids came out of that school it was a sick joke every one was smiling and laughing even the mothers and so called dads were all from the same actor group.
January 28th, 2013 at 7:58 am
“Former Marine” was a dead-ass giveaway. Any Marine I’ve ever known would die before he called himself a “former”, and would kick anyone’s ass who called him that after being corrected the first time.
Sorry, “former Marine”, you blew your cover.