Marine from iconic Fallujah photo mugged in DC

| February 15, 2016 | 112 Comments

Hell-House-Fire-Fight-In-Fallujah-620x400

Chris Marquez, one of the Marines carrying Sergeant Major Brad Kasal in the above photo, was mugged the other night in northwest DC as he left MacDonald’s by some folks who were questioning him about his support for “Black Lives Matter” according to the Daily Caller;

“I remember this group of teens harassing me while I was eating, they surrounded my table and kept on asking me ‘Do you believe black lives matter,’” Marquez told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Then they started calling me a racist. I can’t recall if they were saying anything else to me at this moment because the blow to my head really screwed up my memory.”

DeAnthony Mason, manager of the McDonald’s, reviewed security footage and told Marquez in a phone call Saturday that when he left the restaurant a teen with a white shirt struck him on the side of the head, knocking him unconscious. The other teens then converged on his incapacitated body, taking his belongings. The head blow Marquez sustained left his memory dazed, but Mason’s review of security footage helped him piece together what occurred.

The thieves took $400 in cash and charged up $115 on his credit card at a liquor store, Five Guys and Walmart. According to the article, Marquez was awarded a Bronze Star Medal with a valor device for his service in Iraq. He served eight years in the Marines from 2003 – 2011 and he’s currently a student at American University in our nation’s capitol city.

Category: Dumbass Bullshit

Comments (112)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

Sites That Link to this Post

  1. In The Mailbox: 02.16.16 : The Other McCain | February 17, 2016
  1. Ex-PH2 says:

    Say, that’s a real brave bunch of snots, isn’t it? Get together with yo’ buds, go haze some guy while he’s eating, then hit him while he isn’t looking and steal him blind.

    Well, I hope the POHLEASE people find the little snotlickers and clean their little clocks. Or just turn a bunch of real jarheads loose on them.

    • Silentium Est Aureum says:

      It’s DC. You’ve got a better chance of seeing Zombie Reagan run for president and win there.

      And to the guy who claimed Frankie was being racist, take a walk there some night and see how you fare.

      Thugs gotta thug.

  2. Friend says:

    Hope someone kicks the crap out of the mugger

  3. Dave Hardin says:

    It appears he was not one of the 44 people in DC authorized to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

    This is exactly the reason I avoid places where I am forbidden to protect myself and those I love.

  4. Sapper3307 says:

    Sounds like a hate crime to me.
    Its time to burn the town down.
    Wait, sorry I forgot to check my privilege.

  5. Bucky Katt says:

    DC is a mess. The Capitol Hill neighborhoods have been making a stink about all the crime.

    On a happier note: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/15/sniper-cuts-short-isis-beheading-class-with-a-well-placed-head-shot/

    SAS sniper cuts short ISIS beheading class.

  6. Jarhead says:

    D. C. is and ALWAYS has been a hell hole for whites, especially when alone, easy target. Spent one winter there around ’84 doing my thing in construction. EVERY One of the crew I worked on had been at one time or another robbed by some gangsta hoods, i e, common candy ass thugs who have to be in a pack like black jackasses to pull their crap. All those pieces of SHIT need to come down to South Alabama and learn how the worthless punks deserve to be treated. Yes, we have ’em in B’ham, Tuscaloosa and the likes but when they get further South, it’s a whole different ball game.

    • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

      We don’t hear much about them trying their shit in places like Texas, do we? I see it as proof of how Gun Control Laws do little more than embolden goblins like that because they’re assured vial legislation that law-abiding people will be conveniently unarmed VICTIMS. That and I’m sure they had him by at least 10 or 15 to 1, that and their herd mentality.

    • streetsweeper says:

      Yo, dog. I didn’t any signage for “Safe Space here”, posted.

    • Silentium Est Aureum says:

      FBI crime stats would probably make you stop and reconsider.

      50 times more likely to be a victim of a black-on-white crime than vice versa.

      But which group gets to play the hate crime card?

      • JACK SHIT says:

        SEA knows me.

      • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

        Where do you get your stats, fluffy-head? Whatever it is you take to stay stupid, IT WORKS.

      • Hondo says:

        The raw percentages are relatively meaningless. What is more meaningful is rate statistics which may be calculated from those raw statistics.

        Gross US population demographics for 2014 can be found here.

        http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

        Combining those demographics with the FBI numbers regarding murder, we get the following murderer rates – that is, of a sample population of 100,000 of a given race, how many (race-on-race) murderers are present. It’s heavily skewed towards males, as males commit 85+% of murders in the US.

        White Victim:

        White Perp: 1.008 per 100,000 whites
        Black Perp: 1.060 per 100,000 blacks
        Hispanic/Latino Perp: 1.072 per 100,000 Hispanics/Latinos

        A white guy/gal has about the same chance of randomly meeting someone of another race who will off them as of meeting someone of their own race which will do the deed. This does not hold true of the other two ethnic groups.

        Black Victim:

        White Perp: 0.076 per 100,000 whites
        Black Perp: 5.239 per 100,000 blacks
        Hispanic/Latino Perp: 0.146 per 100,000 Hispanics/Latinos

        A black guy/gal is thus around 69 times more likely to be offed by another black he/she meets at random than a random white. They are approx 2x as likely to be offed by a random Hispanic/Latino they meet as by a random white – but that’s still about 35x less likely than by someone of their own race.

        The situation is similar for Hispanics/Latinos.

        Hispanic/Latino Victim:

        White Perp: 0.024 per 100,000 whites
        Black Perp: 0.283 per 100,000 blacks
        Hispanic/Latino Perp: 0.935 per 100,000 Hispanics/Latinos

        A note here: the numbers are hard to get with certainty, as Census figures consider “Hispanic/Latino” ethnicity vice race. I’ve backed that out as best as I can by referring to the bottom table of the FBI stats cited above an removing “double counting” as best I could – e.g., by removing obvious double counting (e.g. “white-Hispanics”) from the perps and victims totals where I could do so and that made sense.

        Still: a Hispanic/Latino guy/gal is nearly 12x as likely to meet a random black guy or gal who will off them as they are a random white guy/gal who will do so. And they’re 39x as likely to meet another random Hispanic/Latino who will do the deed.

        In summary: murderers of whites seem to be relatively evenly distributed among the US population (I did not consider Asian, American Indian, and mixed race individuals; these constitute <10% of the US population and appear to commit less than 10% of US murders). In contrast, murders of black and Hispanics/Latinos appears very much to be perpetrated disproportionately by their own racial or ethnic group - and to a lesser extent, somewhat disproportionately on one another.

        You might not find that last disturbing. Others might.

        • Hondo says:

          And your feeble attempt at a rebuttal here similarly overlooks the obvious: the vast majority of murders of whites and Hispanics/Latinos are similarly committed by members their own ethnic groups. That means your observation here is true – but is also completely irrelevant. In fact, whether you realize it or not it’s a classic example of the red herring misleading rhetorical technique: a true but irrelevant fact introduced into an argument, often intentionally, to redirect argument away from the actual point under discussion.

          About your second claim, that “whites have difficulty finding minorities” (or words to that effect): that may be true in a state such as North Dakota, where there are no large cities and the statewide minority population is quite low. It is not in general true in any state with or near a large US urban area, or which has a substantial rural minority population (many do).

          For various reasons – primarily but IMO not exclusively economic – minority populations in the US are concentrated in urban areas, and in general in well-known and generally poorer neighborhoods within those urban areas. Thus if someone wants to find members of the larger US minority groups, it’s generally not difficult at all to do so.

          I won’t bother to address your third claim, that “whites take more measures to cover up their crimes while black crimes are more impulsive” (or words to that effect), other than to say it appears absurd on its face. Frankly, it sounds like a restatement of the old white supremacist “blacks are stupid, whites are smart” canard; that was bullsh!t when the Klan and other racist idiots used it back in the 1950s and 1960s, and it’s still bullsh!t today. Provide data to support that claim if you want to be taken seriously on that point.

          In short: it appears you’re cherry-picking facts and applying false logic to support a predetermined conclusion. The reality is that violent crime is overwhelmingly an urban problem, generally concentrated in poorer urban neighborhoods regardless of ethnic composition. It is also overwhelmingly an ethnic-on-same-ethnic issue for all racial and ethnic groups. This is because people tend to live among their own ethnic or racial group, often by choice, and violent crime is usually perpetrated by someone known by or who lives in close geographical proximity to the victim. Blacks and Latinos/Hispanics suffer disproportionately because those populations tend to be clustered in large urban areas in the US, often in said poorer urban neighborhoods which tend to have higher violent crime rates. Stay out – or get out – of large urban areas (and in particular, of the high-crime areas within those large urban areas) and the situation changes dramatically for anyone, regardless of ethnicity or race.

          In short: it ain’t generally race. It’s overwhelmingly location and economics. The racially-based incidents get the press, but they’re actually fairly rare. And they occur with perps from all ethnic and racial groups.

    • JACK SHIT says:

      You don’t know me, barking dog.

    • Poetrooper says:

      Whimpering Cur, you’re the one who is trying to “racify” the crime and censor honest, open commentary, not the folks here who are merely pointing out the obvious.

      As for the greater number of lying, worthless, shiftless, vicious, cowardly whites than blacks you have encountered, try moving to Washington, D.C. and see how long that holds up.

      • Veritas Omnia Vincit says:

        Not only in DC but throughout the nation.

        One of the more interesting aspects of #BLM is just how much that isn’t true even to those who are operating the #BLM movement.

        One thing about the FBI is they keep amazing records and issue this interesting thing each year called the UCR…

        When one starts to dig into the reality behind the numbers there’s a large uncomfortable and often un-discussed reality in those numbers. In large metropolitan areas blacks and latinos commit most of the murders, and not by a small margin.

        In NYC between 89%-93% of the murders are black or latino perps, and mostly black or latino victims. That’s no small percentage, other large metro areas show similar results. The numbers are quite depressing really when one actually cares to consider them.

        If #BLM was being true to its supposed calling there would be a discussion about why it’s more expedient for a young black or latino to engage in violent drug war clashes for economic gain than it is to engage in college degrees for economic gain.

        We’d rather discuss the few dozen cases where the media sensationalizes the outcomes instead of the uncomfortable reality that black people commit crimes (especially murder) far out of proportion to their presence in the population. Because that discussion requires the discussion of race while highlighting statistical data that is extremely unfavorable to the meme of the innocent black man gunned down by officers.

        • Casey says:

          If #BLM was being true to its supposed calling there would be a discussion about why it’s more expedient for a young black or latino to engage in violent drug war clashes for economic gain than it is to engage in college degrees for economic gain.

          Oh, that’s easy. Relatively little actual work resulting in tens of thousands dollars, vice a lot of work resulting in a “boring” 9-to-5 job resulting in $50k – $70k before taxes.

          I know a lot of black men with excellent work ethics, but there’s still a lot out there who are just fine making dirty (and easy) money as criminals. At least it’s easy money until you get shot or sent to prison, but they’re all to smart to get caught.

    • IDC SARC says:

      BD..The entire crime was centered on race. There’s no NEED to draw race into it.

      • JACK SHIT says:

        Poetrooper, VOV and IDC SARC know me.

      • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

        What about “Polar Bear Hunting” or the “knockout game” where packs of those pukes find whoever they think is the most defenseless victim and then attack when they outnumber their chosen victim by at least six to one? How many times do we see and hear about white gangs on blacks versus the other way around, o deluded little powder puff-head? How any times these days do we hear about black “leaders” calling for violence against whites like Farrakhan’s call for his minions to murder 10,000 white people without consequences versus the other way around? I see that you’re very allergic to facts and logic, yapping poodle.

        • IDC SARC says:

          Dayam.. crakahs be cray cray yo.

          Feel better now?lol

        • Veritas Omnia Vincit says:

          What about the AB? What about those serial killers in the EU?

          Are you attempting to justify the actions of the attackers in McDonald’s due to other race related violence?

          There is no justification for violence against civilian victims whether white on white or black on black or any combination thereof.

          The AB is a dangerous prison gang, no argument here. Their actions hardly make assault justifiable. Pretending that the crimes of a minority of the prison population justify other illegal activities is a ridiculous premise and invalidates your argument. Two wrongs never make a right, there is no “quid pro quo” in crime quotas….

          Race was an issue because they asked the young man a race related question before they assaulted him. That places those young men in the same category as the despicable criminals you identify in your responses. That you are attempting to justify the crime based on other crimes rather than equate the crimes based on common factors present in all of those crimes says volumes about you and how your worldview skews your opinion.

          Criminal scumbags are criminal scumbags, there is no justification for any of it, I certainly made no attempt to justify any of those things you mention. You seem upset that this gets more coverage than those other crimes, your beef should be with the media in that case and why the media can’t address their own bias. Instead you chose to respond as if the crime wasn’t racially motivated when race was indeed a factor based on what was reported in the article. Could there be more or less to it? Sure, the media isn’t infallible, but comments here are based on what the article stated.

          The truth is the truth, you don’t have to like it but it doesn’t change or alter the truth.

          The crime certainly doesn’t fit any of the #BLM memes, but crime seldom does. #BLM is only interested in a few very unique cases and not at all interested in black lives lost at the hands of other blacks. If they were they wouldn’t waste time focusing on the LE community, they’d be all over their own communities in liberal run cities all across the nation where black murder rates are obscenely high and the war over drug turf is the basic economic motivator of that violence.

      • Silentium Est Aureum says:

        What about it? Says a lot when you have to go back 20 years to find an opposite example.

        • MrFace says:

          So if there is one cop who shoots a black man with his arms raised, then he is a racist because of that example. Yet, when a group of black men knocked a white guy out because of his race(notice: not the lack of support for a social movement) then they are not racists?

          Makes sense… :/

  7. In a place as dense as DC, the police will look at the footage and say: “They all look alike, no hope of finding them”. Here in my rural corner of the world, most security footage is useful in that most cops know the wannabe gangsters. And, we carry so there is not so great a need for identifying the perps. Were they to have approached my table, and asked that stupid question, I would have shown them one of the two, (or more), weapons I am carrying and suggested they not press me to answer them.

  8. NR Pax says:

    From the article, a little creative editing: “I really think this group of teens is dangerous and will do this type of thing again if they are not caught shot.”

  9. 2/17 Air Cav says:

    I read the article. Here’s the recap, borrowing the reporter’s misused word: He suffered alleged contusions from the alleged assault that allegedly occurred outside a Micky D’s where Marquez had been allegedly accosted while he was allegedly eating and alleged sandwich of a sort not alleged and unknown. His alleged assailants allegedly numbered 5 or 6 and allegedly robbed him. Shortly thereafter, his credit card, which he alleged was stole, was allegedly used at an alleged liquor store and an alleged Walmart. Or so it has been alleged, anyway.

    • Sapper3307 says:

      Yup!
      Just the (alleged)cold facts that we have come to expect.

    • Jarhead says:

      217….Now that’s a lot of ALLEGES. Do you have any proof of them? Hell, man, he could have been STANDING there slurping a SOFT DRINK INSIDE the place and hurled a bunch of racist insults at these poor hungry young men. Furthermore, show us proof that he had not stopped by the liquor store, Wal Mart, and Five Guys BEFORE he went to Mickey D’s. Putting two and two together, he may have slipped on the way in, fallen down, and busted his head wide open, which caused the injury to it. These might have been just a few young men who HAPPENED to show up at the same place at the same time. Have you no pity man? Give me a jury of 12 D. C. morons and we’ll have the so-called victim paying for college for all these unfortunate future outstanding citizens. Such a shame!

      • 2/17 Air Cav says:

        What you say is true, Jarhead, except that the alleged Micky D’s manager has an alleged video of the alleged assault. So, he alleges, anyway!

        • Jarhead says:

          217..Call me the cynic I am, but will it really surprise any of us if the results are: “Too Blurry, could not make out the faces”, “Video tape unit was not working at the time of the incident”, or even “The tapes have somehow come up missing”? Over and over the “Black Lives Matter” phenomenon causes some weird things to happen. The ‘Other Lives” have yet to figure out how once again they are being played like a violin.

    • The Commentor' Formerly Known as MCPO NYC USN Ret. says:

      Alligations and alligators …

      In my world where the two meet there is an arrest …

      But what do I know …

    • nbcguy54ACTUAL says:

      Just throw the little fuckers off of a ledge…

    • Casey says:

      2/17 Air Cav, I understand where you’re coming from, but you do know that every paper (and magazine, and news channel) out there has a style guide, and everyone working there is expected to follow it, right? And that describing crimes/events not yet adjudicated in court are normally described as “alleged,” in that the events in question have not yet been factually established in court, yes?

      So while it may seem silly, it’s a very old stylistic tradition going back to the days when newspapers still had reporters, who didn’t have a narrative to support.

  10. 2/17 Air Cav says:

    So, there is a liquor store. That’s door and inside video. There’s a Walmart. That’s inside and outside video. But somebody has to give a shit and actually work the case.

  11. 2/17 Air Cav says:

    We are all equal–and that includes crime victims. Right. If the victim had been a critter slumming it or even the chief of staff of one, how long would it have taken the task force (the one that would have been formed two minutes after the attack) to locate the SOBs?

    • Jarhead says:

      Wait till the court-appointed (at taxpayers’ expense) attorney gets involved. The victim will be reminded of EVERYTHING non-sociable he has done in his life, starting with the first time he crapped in his diapers. Time to crucify for the good of mankind. That no good so-and-so is the typical reason young men get on the wrong side of the law so early. Just kind, helpful, church going, volunteers at everything, help old ladies across the street (while they are stealing their purse) true gentlemen. So says the well-respected defense attorney.

      • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

        Maybe they’ll go bawling about how the peeps are simply “Victims of Society lashing out from their oppression” or some bleeding-heart-on-the-sleeve candyassed liberal bullshit like that? Anyone who believes that crap needs to share a cell with those societal rodents.

        • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

          What about places like Baltimore where local pols do all they can to hinder Law Enforcement as well as locals mobbing them and filming their every move with cameras and cell phones? That and the”*BLEEP!* the Po-po” mentality in today’s pop culture exemplified with the mega-hypocrite that did an anti-LE halftime show at the Super Bowl? You don’t know what you’re talking about, yapping poodle.

        • Silentium Est Aureum says:

          I’m sorry, where is it that shirts are sold that say, “Snitches get stitches?”

          Want the cops to do more? Then quit hiding the dirtbags in your midst and start turning their asses over.

  12. 20thEB67 says:

    Exactly! Which would occur one minute after the (If I Had A Son) CinC took to the podium, denouncing America as a racist nation.

    This makes me sick, I tell ya.

  13. FatCircles0311 says:

    Scum gonna scum.

    I’m sure Obama is “deeply concerned”……

  14. The Commentor' Formerly Known as MCPO NYC USN Ret. says:

    Is anyone here at TAH surprised in anyway?

    YES or NO?

    Now that we have dispensed with obvious answer, General Election in NOV 2016.

    Out!

  15. Blaster says:

    If he did support the Bullsh!t black lives matter movement, not that they don’t, but so do all the others, do you think he still does after this?

    I think that all of us that are no longer on active duty have to get used to not having a battle buddy watch our backs 24/7. Luckily for me, my Household 6 is a great battle buddy even though she was never officially in the Army. After being married to a Soldier for over 20 years does tend to “train” them though.

  16. Wireman611 says:

    More of Obama’s sons I see.

  17. UpNorth says:

    So, D.C. is more dangerous than Fallujah, these days? I’m shocked! Well, not really.
    Sad, there are things I wanted to see in D.C. but I won’t spend a dime there. Not if it means leaving my good friend, Mr. Springfield, at home.

  18. gitarcarver says:

    A couple of points…..

    McDonald’s should be looking at a lawsuit. If this type of thing is happening inside your restaurant where people are being harassed and threatened and then that harassment moves to a physical assault on your property, that is on you too. (If they catch the people who did this, they should pay for restitution and any award McDonald’s pays.)

    Secondly, isn’t it amazing that people who always demand for “equal rights” only look at the world through discriminatory glasses? You can’t simply be a person anymore. To those folks you are a (insert gender)(insert race)(insert sexual identifications) person.

    Finally, Heather Mac Donald has an article on the Wall Street Journal called “The Myths of Black Lives Matter.”

    Google it and read it.

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      If you take a different view of this, it constitutes nothing more than gang activity by a bunch of teens who just happen to be black and use racism as an excuse to commit a crime.

      It’s just as likely they’d have done it to someone else, too.

  19. Green Thumb says:

    DC sucks.

    I will never live there again.

    Glad the Marine is ok.

  20. AW1Ed says:

    Gun free zone.

    That is all.

  21. Smaj says:

    Chris Marquez needs to know on his worst day he is a far better human being that any of those shitbags who robbed him will ever be. With all the surveillance video available on this a functioning police force would have those shitheels locked up pronto.

  22. Andy11M says:

    Just a new version of the knockout game/polar bear hunting dressed up in a new way.

  23. A Proud Infidel®™ says:

    But just one of those punkassed dropouts gets shot by LE and the whole local herd goes into “OOOHH, IMMA RIOT!!!” mode.

    • Blaster says:

      First- he didn’t say black perps.

      Second- that’s a big negative on getting shot in the back. Michael Brown was not shot in the back, the shooting has been justified yet the town was destroyed, and That is only one example.

      I’m not saying that bad police officers don’t shoot innocent citizens, or good police officers don’t make mistakes, but it doesn’t happen as often as the MSM tries to say it does. Sorry but most of these people that get shot by the police are not upstanding citizens on their way to church or to volunteer at the local homeless shelter.

    • Jarhead says:

      Somebody has to say it sooner or later: There are _____s and there are blacks. Just as there are white trash thugs and there are civilized white people. In both cases those that are first in each sentence are pieces of shit that eventually end up in jail where they belong. Most older folks know the difference in BOTH cases, and are especially tired of the race card being used when nothing else works. Sorry, it does NOT work when violence takes place. I’d like to see the hell-raising that would take place if a group announced it was going nation-wide to be known as White Lives Matter, which they DO. Thugs are thugs and will always be more thugs of any color and opportunity. Generally speaking, when one group is pointed out as a bunch of jackals, it is because we have seen too many of them behaving as such. And we are damned well sick of it. Were someone to attack my wife or myself, REGARDLESS of color, they would as a group be DRT and of little importance to me.

  24. Jarhead says:

    This is for you Whimpering Mutt….There is one BIG difference between the races that cannot be refuted. When a white person is killed by police, you don’t see the white community start raising hell and lead to burning the city down. A civilized behavior does not respond in that fashion.
    You’d do us and yourself a favor by reading the issue at hand and commenting on it if you choose. People have opinions and this is not the place to wage a race war. Race baiters have no place on this web site. This is for discussion of military phonies and those who were never in the armed forces,despite their claims.
    Just go to church and Preacher Wright will get you on the Wright path.

  25. Jarhead says:

    Look you race baiting typical troublemaker. I am a VETERAN, I am a MAN, I am a MARINE. You are none of the above. Dumb ass you are just another trouble maker who will sooner or later be removed from this post if found to not be a veteran. Yes I said there IS a DIFFERENCE….which there IS. So what the hell are you gonna do about it? You gonna talk me to death? You are seriously looking for trouble and will do anything to stir the pot so Al or Jessie will get involved and squeeze every cent out of Jonn they can. I don’t care if you are white or purple, take your entitlement attitude and go elsewhere. No this isn’t the KKK, but you have about as much business on this site as you would at a meeting. While we are interested in discussing Veterans’ issues, you continually want the race issue brought in to your discussions. I’m done with you Jody. You are a waste of my time. With every post you show the true money seeker you want to be. EASY money if you can start the riot. Then blame it on Whitey’s responses. Make sure Lars pulls the covers over you tonight.

    BTW, your “Didn’t so and so do this?” and “so and so do that” lines sound too Larsish for anyone to be fooled. Rather than object to the language used on this site, why don’t you just go elsewhere and see if others will bite and give you reason to sue and put them out of business. Seems to be a pattern these days.

    This will be your last comment from me. Not gonna take the bait and see TAH be shut down for holding conversations your kind do not appreciate.

    This entire story was written to discuss the treatment an individual white man faced when he was alone and eating. What else would you call the damned low-life thugs who hit him from behind, then robbed him, and had the gutless audacity to go charge as much as they could to the victim’s credit card? Multiple black animal-like thugs who had to sneak up from behind him, in spite of an overwhelming number of black thugs that felt they might not be able to handle the one guy man to man. So typical as we see nearly every day. The very reason I do not go out into the public (church included) unarmed. My habit of putting myself either in a corner or a location where I can see who comes & goes through the door is also part of my M. O. when in public. More than once I have seen the same kind of thugs in a business where I have been, but my appearance to them might have caused one of, “Let’s go find an older man who is not so suspicious when the door opens”. If you are white, as you claim, then it’s my belief that you are one extremely uneducated white. You claimed in one your earlier posts on this story that you were accustomed to dealing with “frank people”. If that is true then you should appreciate the comments made by most all of us. We didn’t sugar coat anything, nor beat around the bush. And YOU calling people an idiot just because they don’t agree with you, maybe you are Lars’ moma for all we know. And for someone who claims to be white, you absolutely have tons of stories and publications referring to the so-called suffering of blacks; in addition to so-called stories about white misdoings.

    You really don’t have any reason to be running your mouth on this site to begin with. Instead of commenting on the story at hand, you focus on creating strife between the races. Hey you aren’t the prez. are you?

  26. A Proud Infidel®™ says:

    You’re trolling and trying to hijack the thread while making yourself the center of attention spouting your white guilt propaganda. Yes it was a gaggle of black punks on a single white USMC Veteran and they did it for little more reason than he is white, Lars Taylor JUNIOR! Now lay off of the bong water and look at reality.

    • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

      *NOTE*
      The last few replies I made were to yapping poodle, did his mental excreta get deleted?

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      If I didn’t know better, I’d say it was Insipid slipping in under the cracks, except there was none of that interminable cut-and-paste crap ol’ Splinky used to do.

      More likely, whiny poi dog was some SJW whose only point was the one on his/her/its head.

      Frankly, I think there will be much more conflict ahead, conflict of all kinds and at all levels, and if so, it’s best to stay alert to your surroundings. Chicago is now having to ask the Illinois State Police to bump up their patrols on the Dan Ryan (IL/IN expressway) and on the Eisenhower, both of which are now being patrolled by gangbangers looking for rivals to shoot. And they are mostly teens in the sub-adult stage.

      When someone (who was that?) said that NOT removing guns from the general populace would send this country back into the old Wild West, s/he was wrong. I don’t remember who said that, but just the opposite is happening in cities with super strict gun control, and Chicago and WDC are two fine examples of it.

      If anything, the general citizenry should be johnny-on-the-spot learning to use, handle and be comfortable with personal weapons, because the police are completely useless now.

  27. Jonn Lilyea says:

    If anyone is wondering where their comments went, I whacked all of “barking dog’s” comments because he was nothing but a troll. After doing this for nearly 10 years, I find my patience wearing thin with trolls.

    • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

      Fine by me, I won’t miss his bong water-fueled white guilt campaign! 😃

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      Nicki has an interesting column on the SJWs who are completely butthurt on every possible non-issue, which they have turned into ISSUES.

      If they can’t be trolls on someone’s blog or website, they become public trolls on their own spots. They seem to be an entire generation of spoiled brats who want to get people pissed off at them, and are completely aware of what they’re doing.

    • nbcguy54ACTUAL says:

      Whacked that Humping Dog with a rolled up newspaper, did ya?

      He probably would’ve peed on the carpet next. Thanks Jonn.

    • Jarhead says:

      It was the right thing to do Jonn. Surprised me you let it go as long as you did. For what it’s worth, I don’t care in the least the color of this person’s skin. He was just another leech looking for a reason to say he had been offended. Therein lurks a law suit. Should that happen, there are a LOT of us here to cover your back financially as needed. Well done!

  28. OWB says:

    Recapping:

    A veteran (whose race I still do not know and have no reason to ponder) was the victim of a gang of thugs (whose race I can only assume, given the nature of the taunts they used, but still do not care about) who engaged in on-going criminal activity at the expense of the veteran. Assault, robbery, theft by credit card, and any number of other charges can be levied against the thugs if they are ever identified. We can only hope that they will be so charged.

    Seriously – this is not complicated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *