Valor thief Blumenthal wants to filibuster Gorsuch nomination

| March 20, 2017 | 35 Comments

According to Talking Points Memo, phony Vietnam veteran Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) is chomping at the bit to block the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court if “Gorsuch fails to disavow litmus tests on abortion and guns, among other things.”

“Not only filibuster but use every tool that we have if he is in fact out of the mainstream in that way,” Blumenthal added when asked if he could filibuster Gorsuch. “Remember, we’re talking about respect for a well-established, long-accepted precedent. Roe v. Wade certainly fits that description and that kind of the out-of-the-mainstream thinking will cause me to filibuster and use every tool that I have at my disposal to block his nomination.

I’m not sure how “well-established, long-accepted precedent” makes Roe v. Wade so infallible. Jim Crow laws were the norm for more than a hundred years.

To me it’s not a religious issue, but rather a human rights issue – a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Roe v. Wade cheapens life and sets a dangerous precedent. It benefits hormonally-driven, irresponsible teenaged boys more than it benefits women.

But, you know me, I’ll take any opportunity to remind people that Blumenthal is an opportunistic valor thief.

Category: Politics

Comments (35)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. ChipNASA says:

    Allow me,
    FUCK YOU, Dick.

  2. 2banana says:

    Bring it.

    And when the republicans vote to remove the filibuster, you can tell more lies in your service in Vietnam

  3. 2/17 Air Cav says:

    Litmus test? How about we talk about a polygraph test instead. Not for Gosruch but for the distinguished lying sac o’ shit from Connecticut.

    So, they’ll have their grandstanding and their dog and pony show and, afterwards, we’ll have a new Supreme Court justice. Next item, Dick.

  4. David says:

    so what is litmus test on guns? Gorsuch has to advocate “common-sense” confiscation? I don’t suppose anyone wants to look at something wildly unlikely like say his qualifications?

    Blumenthal looks like a badly sunburned Richie Cunningham after a long day giving blow-jobs behind the Fonz’s garage

  5. Ex-PH2 says:

    Why does Dickie look like someone just goosed him in that photo?

  6. Combat Historian says:

    Hey asswipe, you didn’t hump a pig near Ca Lu nor fling grenades in Cam Lo…You did Toys for Tots in Wash DC, and then you LIED about it!!! So FUCK YOU, DICK !!!

  7. The Other Whitey says:

    Last time I checked, the job description for Supreme Court Justice does not include being “mainstream.” In fact, they’re kinda supposed to ignore “mainstream” in favor of the Constitution. At least, that’s what I was taught in public high school…

    Oh yeah, and Dick Blumenthal can eat a trainload of dicks for this and other transgressions.

  8. Veritas Omnia Vincit says:

    I saw this on the news this morning…and I had that same thought, here’s a lying motherfucker who mis-remembered not actually being in Vietnam as being in Vietnam under fire…and he’s going to try and determine someone else’s honesty regarding their personal views…well I guess if you want someone to detect lies it’s always good to a noted liar to help with the cause.

  9. Wilted Willy says:

    I would rather see this dishonorable pile of steaming rat feces be thrown out of office for his lying ass Stolen Valor claims among other things. To me, there is nothing lower than Stolen Valor, I say drop his ass in the middle of Syria with no food, water or a weapon. If he survives 30 days and can make his way back to friendly lines, then you didn’t drop him far enough away, go drop him a little farther out for another 30 days. Then we’ll talk about your valor? One more thing, Fuck You Ass Hamster!!

  10. A Proud Infidel®™ says:

    Blumenthal can eat a barge load of dicks on his way to hell! EVERY TIME I think I’ve seen a politician reach the bottom depths of lowlivery and scumbaggery, some POS like Blumenthal goes deeper.

  11. Flagwaver says:

    I’m just curious if he’s willing to talk for four years straight. They call the GOP obstructionist for blocking the Obama nomination in the final months of his Presidency, but call it the Biden rule under Bush and now are just throwing a tantrum.

  12. OldSoldier54 says:

    Screw this bozo … and the horse he rode in on, too.

  13. Ex-PH2 says:

    Doesn’t matter who is nominated for SCOTUS. Blumenthal would filibuster and oppose any candidate, including Mahatma Gandhi and Jesus, just because he can.

  14. Stephen F. McCartney, M.D. CAPT USN (ret) says:

    Senator Blumenthal needs to review world geography. “Dick….South Carolina just ain’t the same as South Vietnam. You gotta get it straight” CAPT Bones

  15. ALVO says:

    Dicksucker is on the radio here in CT all the time doing his best SJW / “hep da poor manz” self-agrandizing PR job.
    Fucking Lawyers.

    • Roh-Dog says:

      As a fellow resident of this failed state of CT, I nominate you to run for his seat.
      Hell, I’d vote for a potted plant at this point.
      Fuck Dick “I don’t know where Vietnam is” Blumenthal and his mole faced fuck boy Chris “AR-15s are scary” Murphy.

  16. 11B-Mailclerk says:

    (chuckle)

    The democrats sure are pissed, eh? They haven’t been this mad since the Republicans freed the Dem’s slaves.

  17. USAFRetired says:

    Is this clown trying to say prior precedent is sacrosanct?

    If that were the case than Brown v Board of Education of Topeka Kansas would not have overturned Pless v Ferguson that permitted separate but equal.

    Or that DC v Heller and McDonald v Chicago had put to rest any challenges to individual ownership of firearms.

  18. A Proud Infidel®™ says:

    Hey Blumenthal, FUCK YOU and your retarded hound dog, too!!

  19. gitarcarver says:

    The Gorsuch nomination is problematic for the left because he is an originialist and a believer in the law (as in separation of powers.)

    The left doesn’t want judges who follow the law. They want judges that create laws (see the opinions on the second travel ban for example) and defy the laws that are in place.

    The left has to 1) lie about Gorsuch and or 2) make it seem that his legal and principled opinions are looney. Good luck with that as many of the left leaning legal pundits are having trouble finding problems with his reasoning in cases and are saying “this is not the guy to go after.”

    One of the best articles I read on this was by a leftist who wrote that Gorsuch was not a “respecter of persons” when it came to appearing in his court. He doesn’t care if you were a billion dollar corporation or a homeless person. He treated you the same under the law.

    To me, that is the type of jurist we want. To the left, that is a jurist they cannot tolerate.

  20. O-4E says:

    Iff I were to provide a pictorial example of “slimy politician” for a dictionary or encyclopedia this fucker, along with Hillary and Kerry, would be the example

  21. Tim says:

    For those of us who are hopelessly trapped in Connecticut for now, here’s a video that warms my heart every time I see it. Dick was almost taken out by an AMTRACK train when talking about safety!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *