MSM white-washing terrorists

| June 19, 2017 | 55 Comments

Just a few days before the shooting of a Republican congressman and several others, the Washington Post published an article reviewing last year’s shooting in Orlando by a Muslim male in which 49 American citizens died. Would you believe that other than his name there was no mention of the shooter being Muslim or his motive being Islamic? That despite this headline a year ago. Rather, WAPO’s emphasis a year later was on the gay aspects of the shooting, coloring the event in rainbow shades with only one thing left starkly white, the shooter. Not that WAPO said such a thing; oh no, they’d never do that, not now at least. But just wait a few years and see if WAPO, as well as the rest of the liberal media, hasn’t filed away for posterity the Orlando shooting as a white terrorist hate crime against gay people.
Now the liberal media is tap dancing all over the place to minimize the undeniable reality that this latest shooter is a full-on liberal Democrat, a card-carrying, poster-waving loyalist, and sadly, the ultimate product of their violence-tinged resistance operation against the Trump presidential victory which they refuse to accept.

Okay, I’ll grant the liberal media the easy part: the guy is unquestionably white, but how are they going to twist history to move this ultra-liberal, would-be, assassin/mass-killer into the white terrorism column? In future discussions of violence in America, you can be sure the MSM will trot out the numbers regarding white violence and today’s leftist perp will be among them, as will the Muslim killer in Orlando. At that oft-quoted, little backwater, super-left, white racist-exposing outfit down there somewhere in Alabama or Georgia, whose organizational engines are fueled on high octane liberal feelings of self-righteousness, these guys will be very helpful poster boys for demonstrating the huge presence of white supremacy. They may even get their own dots on that infamous map of right wing lunatics.

Think they can’t and won’t do it? Then you simply do not understand the degree of liberal duplicity that exists in our media and their readiness to employ it. Think I’m exaggerating? Then ignore my warning–after all, the most you can lose is your basic freedoms, such as your ability to speak critically of your government and its policies–perhaps, your ability to speak out at all.

Category: Politics

Comments (55)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. OldSoldier54 says:

    Color me shocked …

  2. chooee lee says:

    All these acronyms are driving me crazy. At my advanced age I can’t remember what they all mean.

  3. gitarcarver says:

    The local rag here did a story on the anniversary of the shooting. There was a memorial service here in the county as well.

    Not one single mention of the motive other than “anti-gay.”

    People in the comments posted about the religious aspect of the shooting (I am being polite) and the editors never responded or said anything. They comment on other corrections or comments on the accuracy of the article, but not this one.

    Also, in case you missed it, the US National Soccer Teams wore uniforms with the numbers being the “gay pride / rainbow flag.”

    I have real issues with the national teams making political statements.

  4. The Old Maj says:

    “At that oft-quoted, little backwater, super-left, white racist-exposing outfit down there somewhere in Alabama or Georgia, whose organizational engines are fueled on high octane liberal feelings of self-righteousness, these guys will be very helpful poster boys for demonstrating the huge presence of white supremacy. ”

    That little group of liars has already identified Gavin Eugene Long as “right wing”.

  5. Perry Gaskill says:

    The news media’s inclination to bowdlerize stories has been going on for a long time. What tends to change over time is who things are toned down for to least offend. In this case it would be both the LGBTQ community and Islam. It also helps if you’ve established a precursor that all straight white people are, by definition, racist and homophobic in order to have someone to blame.

    It’s also no secret that the news media thrives on conflict. Most of the time, unless you have two groups bickering about something, there is no story. What makes the Orlando story different is that the likely actual antagonists have been shifted in order to follow part of an agenda.

    My own view is that the larger agenda is globalisation. One might assume from the protections provided by the First Amendment that The Washington Post would, at a fundamental level, hold the best interests of the country as a prime directive. Such an assumption would be false.

    While it’s true The Post is willing to enjoy free speech protections, it apparently sees it’s actual target readership now as a global one which may not necessarily want to act in a way that benefits the national welfare.

  6. Commissar says:

    Still nothing about the London attack on Muslims.

    Or the Muslim teenager beat to death by a baseball bat.

    Guess these stories do not fit the narrative this board favors.

    Because according to the worldview clinged to on this board only Muslims and democrats commit violence.

    • timactual says:

      No, only Muslims commit worldwide acts of violence in order to further their collective goal of ruling the world in the name of their deity.

      • timactual says:

        And I have not heard anything about a Muslim teenager beaten to death WITH a baseball bat anywhere else, either. Must be part of that vast right-wing conspiracy.

        If it was done BY a baseball bat, I am sure we would have heard about it.

        • The Old Maj says:

          That is a lot of fake concern about a blog that posts maybe five news stories a day not posting about two stories that almost nothing is known about.

          If you know something we don’t feel free to share right now.

        • Graybeard says:

          I believe Lars is referring to Nabra Hassanen, in Virginia.

          I saw news stories about her murder and that the local LEO is not, at this time, considering it a “hate crime” although she was a Muslim girl.

          Not being privy to the information the Virginia LEOs have, I’m inclined to go with their assessment until other evidence is uncovered.

    • 11B-mailclerk says:

      And here I was about to make a post noting the incredible restraint shown, even handedly, about not rushing to judgement in London or pre-judging motivations of this sick evil subhuman fungoid.

      Is all this was? a chance to score points? Because if you cant count, all sorts of folks here are gonna tan your hide with scores you seem to ignore.

      Yup. Angry shithead loon ran a truck into a crowd. Yup, the folks who always warn of not rushing to judgement, rushed to judgement. “See! See!” And here you are sounding almost gleeful it happened, because now you get to virtue-signal here.

      Way to dance on the graves of innocents, dude.

      You do understand that if you are going to count coup, you are going to have a -very- hard time coming up with the counterbalance to a an entire community ignoring a large ring of pedophiles, or the simple count of London Bridge versus this particular hateful subhuman thug.

      Frightened people lash out. The left is doing exactly nothing to reassure anyone, only to stir the shit until it explodes. On -both-sides.

    • The Old Maj says:

      I lay solid money that Darwin Martinez Torres is not a Republican or a Trumpite. Any takers?

      Also he is from El Salvador and does not speak English. Willing to double down on the idea that he entered the country illegally or is here illegally.

      Oh and not a hate crime either:

      Thank goodness you did not rush to judgment. I mean any more than you already did.

      • Fyrfighter says:

        Wow, that is gonna confuse leftists like Lars… an illegal kills a muslim…. gonna be really tough to decide who to back, since they coddle both… I do enjoy the fact that they might hurt themselves with the mental gymnastics involved…

    • Jonn Lilyea says:

      I also didn’t write about the jihadist in Paris. So sue me, pencil dick.

    • Graybeard says:

      Really? You had to spout off like that?

      And here I was thinking you were beginning to engage in reasonable discussions.

      You ought to know by now that the theme at TAH is roughly “things that involve the military, often in regards to stolen valor.”

      The 17 year old young lady murdered by a Salvadorian is a tragic story, but I don’t see a military slant to it. You might as well complain that Jonn doesn’t post stories about children dying of cancer.

      Similarly the guy in London.
      But on the other hand, when the worshipers of the pedophile imbecile have repeatedly used vehicles to attack innocents in Europe, and the Europeans’ “progressive” leaders give them empty words and no deeds that make them feel safe, is it any wonder that someone – probably with mental issues – decides to return the favor?

      • Fyrfighter says:

        GB, Lars reasonable? you must have missed him throwing in with that window licker Joey the other day

        • Graybeard says:

          I saw that and was hoping it was only a temporary flight of insanity.

          Yeah, I’m an optimist.

          • 11B-Mailclerk says:

            It -is- an object lesson form SunTzu: “never press a beaten foe too hard”.

            You can, by going medieval on opponents, drive them to desperate alliances with far, far worse.

            “Commisar”, who is too non-rational to equate “Commie” and “Soviet Political Apparatchtik”, AKA a “Commi-ssar”, is, nevertheless, demonstrably capable of rational thought.

            Which is one reason I rag on him sometimes. He has -demonstrated- better, -numerous- times.

            He could have made a -valid- point, that of one is to oppose senseless violence against civilians, one should probably oppose most of it, most of the time. it begs the question, “why is it wrong to do such things?” One can debate, argue, persuade, etc.


            “See! See! You all are poop-heads!” PooooooFLING!!!!!!!

      • HMCS(FMF) ret says:

        When he made the statement to his butt buddy Joey Nutsack questioning us as being veterans, what little credibility (which wasn’t much) he had with me went down the shitter.

        He’s no better than his Antifa friends…

    • Fyrfighter says:

      Odd I haven’t heard anything about the muslim teenager.. seems the lame stream media would be running with that one.. as for the attack in London, from the initial reports, the dude sounds like a loon… if he is, he needs to be in a padded room for the rest of his life.. if not, and he randomly targeted people because of their religion (sounds familiar?), he should face the same punishment as the others who do that on a regular basis.. fair trial, then hanging… does that make you feel better Lars?

      • Fyrfighter says:

        UPDATE: I just saw on the news about the muslim teenager that was killed.. News says it was road rage incident, and that they have NO EVIDENCE that it was a hate crime… no mention about the immigration status of the perp.

        Sorry Lars, you fail again…

    • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

      HEY Babbles McButthead, JUST HOW MANY of the 9/11 hijackers were non-Middle Eastern muzzies?
      WHAT was the nationality of the Pulse Club shooter as well as the nationality and religion of the goatfucker who drove a truck into a crowd of innocent people in Paris?
      HOW OFTEN do we hear of non-muzzies blowing themselves to confetti in crowds of civilians?

      UP YOURS Babbles McButthead, you lose yet again.

    • IDC SARC says:

      “Still nothing about the London attack on Muslims.:

      You are perfectly capable of writing something up and submitting it to the site or sending an email.

    • gitarcarver says:


      There was also no mention on this blog of an attack by three Muslim women against a daycare worker in London.

      Should we be screaming in protest that Jonn didn’t have a world view that included that attack as well?

      Furthermore, you didn’t condemn any of the attacks at all and instead engaged in a logical fallacy that somehow not reporting everything on a blog is acceptance of a “narrative” of some sort.

      Applying that standard to your life and posts would lead one to the conclusion that you supported all of the attacks by everyone against everyone.

      I would hope that is not the case.

      I don’t know of anyone on this board who seems to support the attacks you mention. No one. In fact, I don’t see where anyone supports any of the attacks made against innocent citizens in whatever name or in the furtherance of whatever cause.

      Well, except for you that is.

      Where is your condemnation of any of the attacks?

      Or is the point of your post “they did it too!” which most mature people stop using after 2nd grade.

      Your post was trolling and not a very good one at that. Shame on you for not condemning any of the attacks and trying to justify anything in pitting the attacks against the others.

  7. FatCircles0311 says:

    Imagine the lies they’ll be posting decades from now.

  8. Ex-PH2 says:

    “Because according to the worldview clinged to on this board only Muslims and democrats commit violence.”

    First of all, this is an incomplete sentence, which means that COMMISSAR LARS TAYLOR got lousy to bad grades in English. He cannot create simple sentences in proper English, but he thinks he’s superior to the rest of us.

    Okay, sure.

    Second, he threw that in for the sole purpose of stirring the pot, because there has been ZERO REFERENCE in the news today or yesterday to any muslim teenager being beaten with a baseball bat, ANYWHERE.

    This implies that his sole purpose in posting comments on This Ain’t Hell is defined as follows:
    A – posting something irrelevant simply to get attention.
    B – posting something that he thinks will piss people off.
    C – (and this one is important) posting some idiotic comment because he still doesn’t have anything to do except smoke dope and hang out at a coffee shop reading Rolling Stone ragazine, scamming refills out of anyone dumb enough to pay for them, and sneering at everyone around him as inconsequential, irrelevant and beneath him.
    D – It’s obvious that no one will talk or respond to him anywhere else.

    I’m going back to Karmennedd now. I have cats to herd, and Ophelia is now Ophiuchus.

    • A Proud Infidel®™ says:

      “First of all, this is an incomplete sentence, which means that COMMISSAR LARS TAYLOR got lousy to bad grades in English.”

      Maybe he got his English Class grade handed to him regardless of his performance in order to boost his self esteem?

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      I almost left out this part, but it’s important. I said ‘bad grades in English’, and it meant it. LARS TAYLOR the COMMISSAR used the word ‘clinged’. This is incorrect. It is NOT the past tense of ‘cling’.

      What’s the past tense of cling?
      Answer: The past tense of cling is clung.

      At this point, I declare and affirm, based on this and his prior samples of bad writing, sloppy semantics and just being enormously lazy, that COMMISSAR LARS TAYLOR is functionally illiterate as well as all those other things.

      He’s also boring as hell, self-involved and too lazy to finish what he starts.

  9. MSgt (ret), USAF says:

    Saw on the U.K. daily mail site that the guy had just broken up with his “partner”, as in he is the gay. Now if true won’t that cause liberal bobble heads to explode. This shit is entirely predictable as others have said. If the muslim savages don’t back the truck up, these incidents will will increase and grow in lethality. The muslims need to look in the mirror to see who is responsible. God help us all.

    • The Old Maj says:

      Turns out he is not gay he is a father of four. He stated he was going out to kill Muslims. He is a moron, probably off his meds and now he will be in prison for the rest of his days.

      One of the goals of the attacks of the last few weeks was to inspire counter attacks against random Muslim in Europe. This helps with recruitment and feeds a narrative. Unfortunately they succeeded.

      “Doing his bit” does not include mowing down random strangers. That is the tool of the other side.

      He does share his name with a gay character on UK television.

  10. MSgt (ret), USAF says:

    Well it was the daily mail which gives tabloid press a bad name they suck so bad 😁

  11. 11b-mailclerk says:

    I made a comment that “coup counting” from the Left might not end well.

    Our Poetrooper delivered the lesson in his post of 20 June.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *