Another Bit of Embarrassment To Explain

| October 17, 2018 | 13 Comments

Unless you’ve been asleep or out in the boonies, it’s mid-term campaign season again. As you can see, there are lovely campaign workers everywhere. Persistent folk, they are. Reasonable in their approach, also.

And here we have candidate Claire McCaskill from Missouri admitting that she’s strongly advocating gun control but not in her campaign rhetoric. She has to get votes, you know, to get the job.  The article from Daily Wire has a video of her admitting strongly to her stance on gun control, when her campaigning appears to suggest just the opposite.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/37173/people-just-cant-know-claire-mccaskill-goes-down-ryan-saavedra?utm_medium=email&utm_content=101618-news&utm_campaign=position1

You see, the object of Democrat political campaigning is to lie your ass off to get the job, and then reveal your real agenda.

Someone, some Democrat politician is objecting in the video to the undercover effort to get the truth out of this mendacious bimp and her bunch of followers. I guess his objection is to the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which clearly states that we have freedom of the press. Now, they would argue that it means only printed material but it was written before the Age of Electronic Media, and yes, it does apply to undercover news collection.

By comparison, if it’s okay for ABC News to expose an eye doctor doing unnecessary surgery on eye patients and bilking Medicare for several million dollars in the 1990s, then why is it not okay for an undercover journalist to expose this blatant hyprocrisy to the light of day?

While some of you thought that I had gone overboard with my bit of satire on how to resist the Fascist Tits Gun Grabbers down the road, the objective is and should always be to thoroughly embarrass these frauds publicly as much as possible, to show them for the lying sacks of absolute crap they are, which is clearly demonstrated in the Daily Wire undercover video.

I lean toward that, rather than toward the alternative suggestion, which involves the wasted energy and wasted resources generated in the course of violence.

Category: Liberals suck, Media

Comments (13)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. MSG Eric says:

    Similar findings in Arizona with the witch who said that it is acceptable for Americans to go fight with the Taliban and that Arizona is the meth lab of democracy.

    It just continues to be a “well they’re in my party so it’s okay for them to say that.” or “you just don’t understand the context of what they said!”

    • Deckie says:

      Always about the context… I remember that excuse in college when arguing with liberal turds. If you tried that while defending conservative comments you’d take more flak than allied bombers over Germany in WW2.

    • SFC D says:

      Kyrsten’s Enema might want to start think about packing up and relocating after the election. She’s dragging a wagonload of bullshit big enough to fertilize the Sinai. I’m not a raging McSally supporter either, but as a local radio commentator puts it; “We have a choice between a 10 lb bag of manure, or an 8 lb bag.”

  2. 2/17 Air Cav says:

    Sure, I objected to your list of illegal acts as unwise was because it will most assuredly reappear somewhere as proof that this site advocates destruction of property. And there it is in black and white for all the world. It is not actionable in itself but it does help those who, for one reason or another, want to hurt TAH.

    As for the recording issue, there is no press exception to recording a private conversation surreptitiously. In those instances where a TV show has done so it is owing to the applicable state law that allows only one party to a private conversation to agree to it. In those states where both parties have to agree, it’s not legal. If it’s in public and someone is talking out loud or screaming or whatever, no problem. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

    • Ex-PH2 says:

      Point still taken, AirCav, but again it was satire. For an even more disturbing piece of satirical lit, read Swift’s essay on “The Solution to the Problem of the Irish Poor”.

      The link that I posted in the other article was rampantly pro-open warfare against the gun grabbing opposition including their statements about what BATFE and the FBI would do, which is most likely based on AG Reno’s attack on the Branch Davidian compound. And you know how disastrous that was.

  3. 5JC says:

    The people of WV learned the hard way with Uncle Joe. Sure he voted for Kavanaugh. but if he didn’t he might have been run out on a rail. He has been leading the anti-gun charge for six years. I think that is long enough for his lies to be out there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *